After having blogged for thepast 2 years at MS 51, I have a lot to reflect on. Blogging has had both a negative and positive affect on me.
I think it was a good thing to reflect over my book at the end of each week, however doing it online has created some complications. For example, having my posts online give everyone with a working computer access to my thoughts. Sometimes, I might not be comfortable sharing all of my ideas, however at the same time it might be a good thing to do this. When its online, I can explore my classmates ideas, and compare them to mine. Others can also do the same for me. When my classmates elaborate off my ideas, I feel liberated and glad that we are able to put out ideas online. However, at the same time this might be limiting.
Knowing that my ideas are open to others, I might not write the same way I would if they werent. What books i choose to read and my opinions on them are now on display. This could have a positive affect, or the negative affect on the craft and subject matter of my writing. This is why writing in your notebook and writing it on your own personal blog can be different. Writing in your own book gives yourself privacy, youre able to write whatever ever you want whenever you want, however this might not always be good. Knowing that only your eyes will see it may not challenge yourself enough.This is when blogs can be a good thing.
However, teenagers may end up abusing the privilege to project theyre thoughts and ideas online. For example, when all youre doing is updating your status on facebook instead of actually communicating your ideas to your friends face to face, blogging may become a bad idea. Personally,Ithink talking to a friend in person is more enjoyable then talking to them online. Forcing students to make blog posts, I think personally is a bad idea. When their class work is online, it just gives them more of a reason to be on the internet more. Being able to share your ideas is a positive thing, but having in dept, heated discussions with a classmate might be a better idea, in my opinion then blogging just to make sure youll get a good grade on your next report card.
For the most part, I honestly cannot see myself continuing with this blog. Blogging for the past two years was a good experience, however I think its best to keep your online time limited.
Margos ELA blog
Thursday, June 12, 2014
Friday, May 30, 2014
angelas ashes
This week I read Angela's Ashes. Even though I have only read about 60
pages I can still tell that it will be a sad book that includes many
difficulties of living in poverty. The book started out with Frankie and
his family of four living in Brooklyn, NY in the 1930's. He is about 4
years old and has a brother who's 2. His father was born in the northern
part of Ireland and is an alcoholic that gets drunk almost every night
and doesnt have a job. His mother, Angela is a beautiful young woman
also from Ireland who came here and got pregnant with Frankie and was
forced to marry his father, Malachy. From the start, Malachy had an "odd
manner" (according to Angela's cousins) and was a mean young man, that
couldn't have turned into anything good. And Angela's cousins were
right, because by the time his second son was born he had turned into a
complete drunk. Not long after Malachy was born (their second son)
Angela gave birth to 2 twin boys, Eugene and Oliver. The father now had
to support 5 other people. Realizing he needs to shape up, Frankies
father gets a job, and for about a month, every week on Friday he comes
home with wages and Angela is able to finally pay the Italian grocer,
and feed her kids. But on the 4th week, he doesnt come home at all. He
is out drinking and once again he is back to his old habits.
For the nest couple weeks Malachy continues to get drunk almost every night and sings Kevin Barry all night. Soon, Angela gives birth to a beautiful baby girl, Margaret and Malachy cannot let go of her. He gets a job again and for about 7 weeks he is sober and instead of singing Kevin Barry every night he sings the Leprechaun Song to Margaret. For those 7 weeks the family is happy again but at the end of the month Margaret passes. Both parents are shocked, their baby girl was the best thing that ever happened to them, and a couple weeks later Angela's cousins come visit again. They see the trouble they are in, and suggest that Angela and her family go back to Ireland. So Angela, Malachy and the 4 boys get on a boat to Ireland and go visit Malachy's parents. However, the poverty in Ireland is just as bad as America and they are forced to go find a place of their own, only to realize that they have no money and are stranded in Ireland.
Angelas Ashes has been very good so far, and I am excited to see what happens next in the memoir.
For the nest couple weeks Malachy continues to get drunk almost every night and sings Kevin Barry all night. Soon, Angela gives birth to a beautiful baby girl, Margaret and Malachy cannot let go of her. He gets a job again and for about 7 weeks he is sober and instead of singing Kevin Barry every night he sings the Leprechaun Song to Margaret. For those 7 weeks the family is happy again but at the end of the month Margaret passes. Both parents are shocked, their baby girl was the best thing that ever happened to them, and a couple weeks later Angela's cousins come visit again. They see the trouble they are in, and suggest that Angela and her family go back to Ireland. So Angela, Malachy and the 4 boys get on a boat to Ireland and go visit Malachy's parents. However, the poverty in Ireland is just as bad as America and they are forced to go find a place of their own, only to realize that they have no money and are stranded in Ireland.
Angelas Ashes has been very good so far, and I am excited to see what happens next in the memoir.
Wednesday, May 14, 2014
lookign for alaska
Today, I continued to read Looking for Alaska by John Green. This week, I
got up to the part in the book where it says "after". John Green
organizes his book in two sections, after Alaska dies and befire. Every
new day, it either says blank days before, or blank days after instead
of dates. Green organzied this so the reader can have suspense leading
up to a certain point, instead of just having random dates and a big
event happening suddenly. In the book, Alaskas death is very sudden, and
if the reader didnt already know that something massive was going to
happen, it wouldnt be a good idea.
John Green, is known for kiling off his amin characters, which is what he did in Looking For Alaska. The night before it happened, or the night of, a major thing happens for the main character. Miles, or Pudge finally gets together with Alaska. Throughtout most of the book, the reader is waitinf for Pudge and Alaska to get together. Eventually, Pudge goes out with a charming, nice girl named Lara. However, right after they start dating, Alaska and aPudge get together. The whole book, the reader has been waiting for this, however that is when "after" starts.
The next morning, Chip and Pudge awake to the eagle knocking on their door telling them to come to the gym. Instead of being yelled at like they were expecting, they find Mr Barnes with tears in his eyes telling the whoke school that Alaska Young has died in a car crash the night before. So far, Pudge and The Colonel are having a hard time accepting that Alaska, the smart, funny, beautiful girl is dead. I am eager to see how they deal with it, and if they are ever going to accept the truth.
John Green, is known for kiling off his amin characters, which is what he did in Looking For Alaska. The night before it happened, or the night of, a major thing happens for the main character. Miles, or Pudge finally gets together with Alaska. Throughtout most of the book, the reader is waitinf for Pudge and Alaska to get together. Eventually, Pudge goes out with a charming, nice girl named Lara. However, right after they start dating, Alaska and aPudge get together. The whole book, the reader has been waiting for this, however that is when "after" starts.
The next morning, Chip and Pudge awake to the eagle knocking on their door telling them to come to the gym. Instead of being yelled at like they were expecting, they find Mr Barnes with tears in his eyes telling the whoke school that Alaska Young has died in a car crash the night before. So far, Pudge and The Colonel are having a hard time accepting that Alaska, the smart, funny, beautiful girl is dead. I am eager to see how they deal with it, and if they are ever going to accept the truth.
Thursday, April 24, 2014
critical analysis- "When Enforcing School Dress Code Turns into Slut Shaming"
"When Enforcing School Dress Code Turns in Slut Shaming" gives reports on several different middle and high schools, where the girls have had enough from the dress code. The author explains through different quotes and stories of girls being slut shamed by their school dress code to create the argument that the way most schools are executing their rules is wrong. In fact, the person writing this article has gone through this herself. For example, the article begins with an example from the authors own life. "I had my leggings on under a dress, which admittedly probably didn’t
pass the fingertip rule. My female teacher admonished me in front of the
class before sending me home to change." Using the word admonished gets a cross to the reader that the teacher was very serious with her, almost critical.
She again gave more quotes from students who experienced the same thing. "Lucy Shapiro, a 12-year-old at Haven, added that when both she and a friend wore the same type of athletic shorts, a teacher disciplined her but not her friend because, she was told, “I had a different body type than my friend…With all the social expectations of being a girl, it’s already hard enough to pick an outfit without adding in the dress code factor.”, she includes about a middle schooler. She also gives examples of girls protesting their right to wear what they want without having to worry about whether or not their bodies will "distract" male students. "Five hundred students signed their petition, and a group of girls wearing leggings and yoga pants (also banned) protested outside the school last week with signs saying, “Are my pants lowering your test scores?” she reports on a group of girls in Illinois. She supplies well, thought out evidence showing that her opinion is obviously the better one. She also gave a good counter argument. She mentioned how many schools would suggest uniforms, but refuted the argument by talking about how most high schoolers (including herslef) would oppose that idea. "Many teens (including myself when I was in high school) would argue that a uniform would prevent them from expressing their identity through their clothing when forging their individuality in middle school and high school is hard enough." However she didn't include much information from the opposing side, even if she had I think her evidence still would've given a better argument.
Not only does she give strong evidence, but she also compared the situation to much bigger things in the world. "The argument being made by school administrators is not that distant from the arguments made by those who accuse rape victims of asking to be assaulted by dressing a certain way." Again, she countered the argument by comparing it to something that most people are appalled by. Also, by including her own experience in high school to start of the article makes the reader want to hear what she has to say. Overall, I think the author executed the article very well and convinced readers that didn't already share her opinion, to seriously think about it.
A link to the article: http://time.com/36997/when-enforcing-school-dress-codes-turns-into-slut-shaming/
She again gave more quotes from students who experienced the same thing. "Lucy Shapiro, a 12-year-old at Haven, added that when both she and a friend wore the same type of athletic shorts, a teacher disciplined her but not her friend because, she was told, “I had a different body type than my friend…With all the social expectations of being a girl, it’s already hard enough to pick an outfit without adding in the dress code factor.”, she includes about a middle schooler. She also gives examples of girls protesting their right to wear what they want without having to worry about whether or not their bodies will "distract" male students. "Five hundred students signed their petition, and a group of girls wearing leggings and yoga pants (also banned) protested outside the school last week with signs saying, “Are my pants lowering your test scores?” she reports on a group of girls in Illinois. She supplies well, thought out evidence showing that her opinion is obviously the better one. She also gave a good counter argument. She mentioned how many schools would suggest uniforms, but refuted the argument by talking about how most high schoolers (including herslef) would oppose that idea. "Many teens (including myself when I was in high school) would argue that a uniform would prevent them from expressing their identity through their clothing when forging their individuality in middle school and high school is hard enough." However she didn't include much information from the opposing side, even if she had I think her evidence still would've given a better argument.
Not only does she give strong evidence, but she also compared the situation to much bigger things in the world. "The argument being made by school administrators is not that distant from the arguments made by those who accuse rape victims of asking to be assaulted by dressing a certain way." Again, she countered the argument by comparing it to something that most people are appalled by. Also, by including her own experience in high school to start of the article makes the reader want to hear what she has to say. Overall, I think the author executed the article very well and convinced readers that didn't already share her opinion, to seriously think about it.
A link to the article: http://time.com/36997/when-enforcing-school-dress-codes-turns-into-slut-shaming/
Monday, April 21, 2014
Romeo and Juliet -Literary Essay
The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet follows two
young teenagers who fall and love, only to both end up dead. William
Shakespeare includes various themes in the play, like rivalry, fate, love and
marriage. However I think religion is a theme that is particularly under looked
and has much more to do with the okay then many may think. Religion completely
changed the plot, and even caused the couples deaths. Friar Lawrence’s
character represents religion in the story; therefore he is the one to blame
for the couples’ death. Not only does he make poor decisions, but he also fails
to fix his mistakes.
Friar Lawrence represents religion
in the story. Religion is something people go to for guidance; they ask the
leaders of their place of worship and god for advice. Romeo and Juliet ask the
same from Friar Lawrence. In act 2 scene 3, Romeo immediately goes to Friar
Lawrence after meeting Juliet. After some discussion of Romeos newfound love,
he asks him to marry them. “We met, we wooed and made exchange of vow, Ill tell
thee as we pass, but this I pray: That thou consent marry us today.” Romeo
begs. Friar Lawrence is instantly concerned and asks about Rosaline, Romeos
previous beloved. However Romeo protests, “Thou chid’st me off for loving
Rosaline.” This means that Friar Lawrence often gave his pupil advice about
Rosaline. Already, we are introduced to the close relationship the two shares.
Another example of Friar Lawrence giving advice is when Romeo and Juliet are
wed. He warns Romeo in act 2 sc. 6 to be careful with his love. “Therefore love
moderately” he advises. This is again more guidance given to the teenagers. The
biggest advice the Friar gives them of course is when he gives Juliet the
potion. When the soon to be wife of Paris has nothing left she can do to prevent
the wedding, she asks Friar Lawrence for help. In Act 4 sc. 1 she pleads
“Therefore out of thy long experienced time, give me some present counsel…” His
advice is to obviously take the vial. This changes the story completely, and
contributes to the reason of why he’s responsible for their deaths. After all
the guidance Friar Lawrence gives them throughout the play, he obviously
represents religion.
Religion and Friar Lawrence play such a big
role in the story, they are responsible for the couples’ deaths. First off,
Friar Lawrence gives Juliet the liquid that makes her appear dead, putting her
in a situation that results in her and her husbands suicides. “Take thou this
vial, being then in bed and this distilled liquor drink thou off,” Friar tells
Juliet. By trusting a 13-year-old girl with such a big responsibility was an
ignorant decision; and this ignorant decision cost Romeo and Juliet their
lives. Another terrible decision Friar Lawrence made was not giving Romeo his
letter on time. Friar Lawrence trusted Friar John with a huge piece of
information. He failed to even tell Friar John how critical it was for Romeo to
receive the letter with information about Juliet taking the potion. In act 4
sc. 2 Friar John returns with the same letter. “I could not send it-here it is
again-(gives Friar Lawrence a letter) Nor get a message to bring it to thee, so
fearful were they of infection.” Friar John explains. Lawrence then makes an
effort to go to the tomb where Juliet resides and save her, but obviously fails.
After Romeo kills Paris in act 5 sc. 3, and says his final words “And so I die
with a kiss”, Juliet awakes to find Lawrence. However as soon as he hears
something outside, he leaves Juliet with her dead husband, fearful that the
watch will discover him. “Stay not to question, for the watch is coming. Come,
go, good Juliet, I dare not longer stay”, He tells Juliet right before running
away. The widow then left alone, takes a dagger to her heart and kills herself.
By leaving Juliet alone and not giving Romeo the correct information, Friar
Lawrence completely changes the direction of the play. And because of his poor
guidance, he causes the couple to die.
Friar Lawrence could've easily avoided Romeo and Juliet's deaths. Friar Lawrence should not have so immediately married the to young teenagers, especially knowing that it was in secrecy. In act 2 sc. 6, Friar Lawrence warns Romeo about the marriage. "These violent delights have violent ends and in their triumph die, like fire and powder, which, as they kiss, consume. The sweetest honey is loathsome in his own deliciousness and in the taste confounds the appetite", he says. This obviously shows that Friar Lawrence has a bad feeling about the marriage. Not only does he not stop the marriage, but he actually marries them himself. And again, in Act 3 sc. 3, he admits to Romeo that marrying Juliet was a disaster. He says, "Romeo, come forth, Come forth, thou fearful man. Affliction is enamoured of thy parts, and thou art wedded to calamity." This also reveals that Friar Lawrence was hypocritical. He marries the two but then admits to it being a bad idea. This also shows that Friar Lawrence is unaccountable and sort of has bad character. He stood by watching the teenagers die, even though he could've prevented it.
Friar Lawrence is a symbol for religion in
the story, and because he fails Romeo and Juliet, so does religion. He makes
cowardly, ignorant decisions that were easily avoided. Overall, Friar Lawrence
completely changes the fate of the teenagers and the plot of the play.
Monday, April 7, 2014
Kitchen by Banana Yoshimoto
This week, I began to read Kitchen, by Banana Yoshimoto.The book follows Mikage, a young woman trying to juggle adulthood, her love for cooking, and the endless amounts of deaths that seem to haunt her.
The story takes place in Tokyo during the 1980s. Mikage, after losing her last blood relative, her grandmother, moves in with Yuichi and his mother, Eriko (who was once his father), a kind family that also seems to be haunted by death. Over the summer, Mikage pursues her love of cooking, finds a part time job where she can exercise her devotion to kitchens, and moves out in the fall. A few months pass when suddenly on a night in january, she gets a call from Yuichi telling her Eriko died, 3 months ago. Mikage and Yuichi seem to come to the conclusion that everywhere they go, they're followed by death. They even make jokes about becoming hit men. Although Yuchi and Mikage still make jokes and laugh with each other, the inevitable fact is that, they have nobody but themselves.
I think that the author is trying to have death represent something. I think the overall message of the story is that death can't be avoided, which is okay. Death is something that happens to everyone and is apart of nature. And that even people like Mikage or Yuichi, who are always surrounded by death, can still be okay.
The story takes place in Tokyo during the 1980s. Mikage, after losing her last blood relative, her grandmother, moves in with Yuichi and his mother, Eriko (who was once his father), a kind family that also seems to be haunted by death. Over the summer, Mikage pursues her love of cooking, finds a part time job where she can exercise her devotion to kitchens, and moves out in the fall. A few months pass when suddenly on a night in january, she gets a call from Yuichi telling her Eriko died, 3 months ago. Mikage and Yuichi seem to come to the conclusion that everywhere they go, they're followed by death. They even make jokes about becoming hit men. Although Yuchi and Mikage still make jokes and laugh with each other, the inevitable fact is that, they have nobody but themselves.
I think that the author is trying to have death represent something. I think the overall message of the story is that death can't be avoided, which is okay. Death is something that happens to everyone and is apart of nature. And that even people like Mikage or Yuichi, who are always surrounded by death, can still be okay.
Thursday, March 20, 2014
Sula by Toni Morrison
This week, i continued to read "Sula" by Nobel prize winner, Toni Morrison. Sula is similar to "The Bluest Eye", the other novel i've read by her recently. It focuses on the struggles of black people in America duting the 20th century. It follows Sula and her friend Nel Wright living in a town known to most people as "The Bottom", an area right past the rich white part of town. Sula is much more about the characters themselves then the message, contradictive to the bluest eye. Sula is sort of an odd little girl growing up with her grandma, Eva, a strong, sort of manipulative black woman with one leg, and her mother, hannah. Hannah and Eva are sort of opposites however they love eachother. Hannah is similar to her mother in the way that she can get most men to do what she wants, however i wouldnt say as brutal as eva. Even though Hannah has admitted to not liking her kids, Eva on the other hand set hers on fire. Fire actually plays a big role in the book.
Not one, but two of Evas children are burned to death. One day, Eva witnesses a series of "strange things". It starts out with Hannah asking her mother, "Mamma, did you ever love us?" Eva answers a truthful no, but angrily explains how she clothed her and fed her and kept her alive. Next, Hannah asks about Plum, evas sons death. Eva's explanation is sort of odd however. She explains how difficult Plums birth was, and when he came back, Eva felt as if she wanted to crawl back up her womb. She couldnt allow that, so she set him on fire. The nect event is a dream Hannah had about a red wedding dress, which we later realize means death and fire. However the dream is forgotten because of Sula acting up. Next, the day Hannah dies, Eva cant find her comb. Which is unusual because "Nobody moved stuff in Eva's room except to clean and then they put everything right back". Shortly after, she sees Hannah running around on fire from her window. In an effort to out the fire out, she tries to fall 12 feet onto Hannah. This attempt at saving her doesnt work. Finally by the time the fire is out, its too late and she dies on the way to the hospital, however Eva survives. The last "strange thing" eva remembers is sula. She recalls when Hannah was running around trying to put her fire out, and she was lying there, bleeding she saw sula. Staring there watching her mother burn and her grandmother suffer.
After that, we fast forward to Sula and Nel grown up. Sula suddenly disappears for to where we find out was college, to just return 10 years later and sleep with Nels husband. So far, I'm stilling trying to figure out what Sula's oddness really means and what the whole book symbolizes.
Not one, but two of Evas children are burned to death. One day, Eva witnesses a series of "strange things". It starts out with Hannah asking her mother, "Mamma, did you ever love us?" Eva answers a truthful no, but angrily explains how she clothed her and fed her and kept her alive. Next, Hannah asks about Plum, evas sons death. Eva's explanation is sort of odd however. She explains how difficult Plums birth was, and when he came back, Eva felt as if she wanted to crawl back up her womb. She couldnt allow that, so she set him on fire. The nect event is a dream Hannah had about a red wedding dress, which we later realize means death and fire. However the dream is forgotten because of Sula acting up. Next, the day Hannah dies, Eva cant find her comb. Which is unusual because "Nobody moved stuff in Eva's room except to clean and then they put everything right back". Shortly after, she sees Hannah running around on fire from her window. In an effort to out the fire out, she tries to fall 12 feet onto Hannah. This attempt at saving her doesnt work. Finally by the time the fire is out, its too late and she dies on the way to the hospital, however Eva survives. The last "strange thing" eva remembers is sula. She recalls when Hannah was running around trying to put her fire out, and she was lying there, bleeding she saw sula. Staring there watching her mother burn and her grandmother suffer.
After that, we fast forward to Sula and Nel grown up. Sula suddenly disappears for to where we find out was college, to just return 10 years later and sleep with Nels husband. So far, I'm stilling trying to figure out what Sula's oddness really means and what the whole book symbolizes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)